Super encore un nouveau port incompatible.

C'est pas de moi, mais vu que ça résume assez bien tout ce qu'il y a dire (en anglais) : How DisplayPort Differs from DVI : DVI is not available with mainstream integrated graphics solutions in PCs. What they mean by this is that a digital display interface needs to be compatible with sub-65nm process technology in order to have broad availability in PCs. The DVI 1.0 specification is "frozen" and can’t really be updated, therefore its dot clock and color depth are fixed. It’s also somewhat difficult to reduce electronics in a monitor design with DVI. As a result manufacturers are stuck with the rather large DVI connector. In addition, displays with greater than UXGA resolution require dual channel DVI implementation. How DisplayPort Differs from HDMI : HDMI is a great consumer electronics interface, but VESA does not feel it is the best solution for PCs as a monitor interface. A somewhat limited performance is available in terms of resolution and color depth for PC monitors (see comparison chart for exactly how this might impact future displays). HDMI is designed to be a premium A/V interface, rather than as a broadly available general purpose display interface. The HDMI specification is not geared to unifying internal and external display connections; its primary focus is consumer electronics. Et pour finir un petit comparatif entre les différents standards : http://www.audioholics.com/news/upl...mpared.gif